{"id":3890,"date":"2012-11-29T17:44:00","date_gmt":"2012-11-29T20:44:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.etice.ce.gov.br\/2012\/11\/29\/estados-melhoram-pontuacao-no-indice-da-transparencia\/"},"modified":"2012-11-29T17:44:00","modified_gmt":"2012-11-29T20:44:00","slug":"estados-melhoram-pontuacao-no-indice-da-transparencia","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.ce.gov.br\/etice\/2012\/11\/29\/estados-melhoram-pontuacao-no-indice-da-transparencia\/","title":{"rendered":"Estados melhoram pontua\u00e7\u00e3o no \u00cdndice da Transpar\u00eancia"},"content":{"rendered":"

Ranking do site Contas Abertas mostra que em 18 portais houve melhorias, em rela\u00e7\u00e3o a 2010, e nove tiveram redu\u00e7\u00e3o de nota.<\/p>\n

A transpar\u00eancia das contas p\u00fablicas dos 26 estados e do Distrito Federal aumentou nos \u00faltimos dois anos, conforme mostra o \u00cdndice de Transpar\u00eancia, iniciativa do site Contas Abertas, que avalia a disponibilidade de informa\u00e7\u00f5es or\u00e7ament\u00e1rias e financeiras nas 27 unidades federativas. A edi\u00e7\u00e3o 2012, divulgada esta semana, mostra que a nota m\u00e9dia foi 5,74, contra 4,88 da primeira edi\u00e7\u00e3o, em 2010.<\/p>\n

O \u00cdndice de Transpar\u00eancia avalia o conte\u00fado, a frequ\u00eancia de atualiza\u00e7\u00e3o e a facilidade de uso dos portais de transpar\u00eancia or\u00e7ament\u00e1ria. O projeto foi institu\u00eddo pela Associa\u00e7\u00e3o Contas Abertas com base na Lei Complementar 131\/2009 (LC 131), que obrigou a divulga\u00e7\u00e3o em tempo real na internet de informa\u00e7\u00f5es pormenorizadas sobre a execu\u00e7\u00e3o or\u00e7ament\u00e1ria e financeira.<\/p>\n

Dos 27 avaliados, 18 portais aumentaram suas notas entre 2010 e 2012 e S\u00e3o Paulo manteve a primeira coloca\u00e7\u00e3o. Com a nota 9,29, o estado, al\u00e9m de ter mantido a lideran\u00e7a, foi o \u00fanico a superar os nove pontos (em 2010 obteve 6,96). Na edi\u00e7\u00e3o 2012, S\u00e3o Paulo \u00e9 seguido pelo Esp\u00edrito Santo, com 8,73, um salto consider\u00e1vel na compara\u00e7\u00e3o com 2010, quando ocupava o oitavo lugar, com nota 5,36. Foi o maior aumento de nota que o \u00cdndice de Transpar\u00eancia 2012 registrou. A evolu\u00e7\u00e3o do estado se deve a melhorias como disponibiliza\u00e7\u00e3o de download das consultas individuais e do banco de dados completo, publica\u00e7\u00e3o dos sal\u00e1rios dos servidores estaduais de forma nominal, apresenta\u00e7\u00e3o de lista completa dos benefici\u00e1rios de pagamentos e maior transpar\u00eancia a respeito das receitas do estado. O portal capixaba n\u00e3o possu\u00eda nada disso na avalia\u00e7\u00e3o de 2010.<\/p>\n

Em terceiro lugar est\u00e1 Pernambuco (com 7,87), seguido por Rio de Janeiro, Minas Gerais, Rond\u00f4nia e Cear\u00e1<\/strong> \u2013 todos com notas na casa dos sete pontos. Completam a lista de top 10 Santa Catarina, Para\u00edba e Rio Grande do Sul (com notas na casa de seis). Veja abaixo tabela com a classifica\u00e7\u00e3o e pontua\u00e7\u00e3o dos estados. O Conta P\u00fablicas destaca tamb\u00e9m o avan\u00e7o do Cear\u00e1.<\/strong> O portal de transpar\u00eancia cearense havia alcan\u00e7ado a 20\u00aa posi\u00e7\u00e3o no \u00cdndice de Transpar\u00eancia 2010. De l\u00e1 para c\u00e1, cresceu 2,91 pontos: saiu de 4,18 para 7,09, nota que o credenciou \u00e0 s\u00e9tima posi\u00e7\u00e3o neste ano. O salto de 13 lugares na classifica\u00e7\u00e3o foi o maior: nenhum outro estado ganhou tantas coloca\u00e7\u00f5es de uma vez s\u00f3. Entre os avan\u00e7os efetuados pelo Cear\u00e1<\/strong> est\u00e3o disponibiliza\u00e7\u00e3o de download das consultas individuais, aumento da delimita\u00e7\u00e3o temporal de consulta e inclus\u00e3o de todas as informa\u00e7\u00f5es relativas \u00e0 classifica\u00e7\u00e3o or\u00e7ament\u00e1ria da despesa.<\/p>\n

De acordo o site Contas Abertas, apenas nove sofreram alguma redu\u00e7\u00e3o de nota. Em m\u00e9dia, os avan\u00e7os foram maiores do que as quedas: enquanto apenas um estado (Mato Grosso do Sul) perdeu mais do que um ponto, 10 portais de transpar\u00eancia ganharam, pelo menos, a mesma pontua\u00e7\u00e3o. A principal explica\u00e7\u00e3o para a redu\u00e7\u00e3o das notas de alguns portais foi a aplica\u00e7\u00e3o mais rigorosa dos crit\u00e9rios do \u00cdndice de Transpar\u00eancia. Na edi\u00e7\u00e3o 2010, como a LC 131 estava em vigor h\u00e1 pouco tempo, foram pontuados at\u00e9 mesmo aqueles portais de transpar\u00eancia que possu\u00edam apenas os relat\u00f3rios da Lei de Responsabilidade Fiscal.<\/p>\n

Se a primeira posi\u00e7\u00e3o foi mantida, a lanterna mudou de m\u00e3os: agora, a \u00faltima posi\u00e7\u00e3o pertence ao Mato Grosso do Sul, que obteve 2,98 pontos. O estado registrou queda de 1,46 ponto, a mais significativa entre todos os avaliados, e substituiu o Piau\u00ed como \u00faltimo colocado no ranking. O grupo dos dez piores inclui Mato Grosso, Sergipe, Piau\u00ed, Roraima, Par\u00e1, Acre, Bahia, Amap\u00e1 e Amazonas.<\/p>\n

O portal do Mato Grosso do Sul possui entre suas principais defici\u00eancias a impossibilidade de download das informa\u00e7\u00f5es, a pequena s\u00e9rie hist\u00f3ria (apenas tr\u00eas anos), o pouco detalhamento da execu\u00e7\u00e3o or\u00e7ament\u00e1ria e a aus\u00eancia de informa\u00e7\u00f5es sobre servidores, contratos, conv\u00eanios e licita\u00e7\u00f5es (neste \u00faltimo quesito a aus\u00eancia n\u00e3o \u00e9 total, mas h\u00e1 poucos dados dispon\u00edveis).<\/p>\n

A queda de posi\u00e7\u00e3o mais significativa foi do Paran\u00e1. O estado perdeu 10 posi\u00e7\u00f5es entre 2010 (4\u00ba colocado) e 2012 (14\u00ba colocado). A redu\u00e7\u00e3o num\u00e9rica da nota n\u00e3o foi t\u00e3o grande (0,49 ponto), mas, como a maioria dos estados cresceu, o impacto de um desempenho negativo mostrou-se maior. O principal motivo para a queda do portal paranaense foi a retirada da divulga\u00e7\u00e3o nominal dos sal\u00e1rios dos servidores estaduais. Em 2010, o estado era o \u00fanico a apresentar essa informa\u00e7\u00e3o, mas, em 2012, essa n\u00e3o constava mais no site. Questionados, os respons\u00e1veis explicaram que uma liminar judicial proibiu esse tipo de divulga\u00e7\u00e3o.<\/p>\n

Outros estados que perderam nota foram, por exemplo, Sergipe (25\u00ba colocado, 0,84 ponto a menos), Mato Grosso (26\u00ba colocado, 0,55 ponto a menos) e Par\u00e1 (22\u00ba colocado, 0,50 ponto a menos). J\u00e1 entre os estados que mais perderam posi\u00e7\u00f5es est\u00e3o Amazonas (18\u00ba colocado, 9 posi\u00e7\u00f5es perdidas), Maranh\u00e3o (17\u00ba colocado, 8 posi\u00e7\u00f5es perdidas) e Rio Grande do Sul (10\u00ba colocado, 7 posi\u00e7\u00f5es perdidas).<\/p>\n

Ranking 2012<\/p>\n

Posi\u00e7\u00e3o\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Estado\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Nota<\/p>\n

1\u00ba\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 S\u00e3o Paulo\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 9,29<\/p>\n

2\u00ba\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Esp\u00edrito Santo\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 8,73<\/p>\n

3\u00ba\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Pernambuco\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 7,87<\/p>\n

4\u00ba\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Rio de Janeiro\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 7,80<\/p>\n

5\u00ba\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Minas Gerais\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 7,38<\/p>\n

6\u00ba\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Rond\u00f4nia\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 7,13<\/p>\n

7\u00ba\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Cear\u00e1\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 7,09<\/strong><\/p>\n

8\u00ba\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Santa Catarina\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 6,91<\/p>\n

9\u00ba\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Para\u00edba\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 6,56<\/p>\n

10\u00ba\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Rio Grande do Sul\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 6,27<\/p>\n

11\u00ba\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Rio Grande do Norte\u00a0\u00a0 6,07<\/p>\n

12\u00ba\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Alagoas\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 5,85<\/p>\n

13\u00ba\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Distrito Federal\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 5,58<\/p>\n

14\u00ba\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Paran\u00e1\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 5,58<\/p>\n

15\u00ba\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Tocantins\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 5,35<\/p>\n

16\u00ba\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Goi\u00e1s\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 5,11<\/p>\n

17\u00ba\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Maranh\u00e3o\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 5,07<\/p>\n

18\u00ba\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Amazonas\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 5,02<\/p>\n

19\u00ba\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Amap\u00e1\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 5,00<\/p>\n

20\u00ba\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Bahia\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 4,78<\/p>\n

21\u00ba\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Acre\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 4,42<\/p>\n

22\u00ba\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Par\u00e1\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 4,15<\/p>\n

23\u00ba\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Roraima\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 4,11<\/p>\n

24\u00ba\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Piau\u00ed\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 3,96<\/p>\n

25\u00ba\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Sergipe\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 3,49<\/p>\n

26\u00ba\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Mato Grosso\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 3,38<\/p>\n

27\u00ba\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Mato Grosso do Sul\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 2,98<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Fonte: (tele.s\u00edntese e contas abertas)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Ranking do site Contas Abertas mostra que em 18 portais houve melhorias, em rela\u00e7\u00e3o a 2010, e nove tiveram redu\u00e7\u00e3o de nota. A transpar\u00eancia das contas p\u00fablicas dos 26 estados e do Distrito Federal aumentou nos \u00faltimos dois anos, conforme mostra o \u00cdndice de Transpar\u00eancia, iniciativa do site Contas Abertas, que avalia a disponibilidade de […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":12,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[53],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3890","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-lista-de-noticias"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nEstados melhoram pontua\u00e7\u00e3o no \u00cdndice da Transpar\u00eancia - ETICE<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/ww16.ce.gov.br\/etice\/2012\/11\/29\/estados-melhoram-pontuacao-no-indice-da-transparencia\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"pt_BR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Estados melhoram pontua\u00e7\u00e3o no \u00cdndice da Transpar\u00eancia - ETICE\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Ranking do site Contas Abertas mostra que em 18 portais houve melhorias, em rela\u00e7\u00e3o a 2010, e nove tiveram redu\u00e7\u00e3o de nota. A transpar\u00eancia das contas p\u00fablicas dos 26 estados e do Distrito Federal aumentou nos \u00faltimos dois anos, conforme mostra o \u00cdndice de Transpar\u00eancia, iniciativa do site Contas Abertas, que avalia a disponibilidade de […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/ww16.ce.gov.br\/etice\/2012\/11\/29\/estados-melhoram-pontuacao-no-indice-da-transparencia\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"ETICE\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2012-11-29T20:44:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Felipe Regino\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Felipe Regino\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutos\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ww16.ce.gov.br\\\/etice\\\/2012\\\/11\\\/29\\\/estados-melhoram-pontuacao-no-indice-da-transparencia\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ww16.ce.gov.br\\\/etice\\\/2012\\\/11\\\/29\\\/estados-melhoram-pontuacao-no-indice-da-transparencia\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Felipe Regino\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ww16.ce.gov.br\\\/etice\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/c161ec0016dc344c216317bdddb5a662\"},\"headline\":\"Estados melhoram pontua\u00e7\u00e3o no \u00cdndice da Transpar\u00eancia\",\"datePublished\":\"2012-11-29T20:44:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ww16.ce.gov.br\\\/etice\\\/2012\\\/11\\\/29\\\/estados-melhoram-pontuacao-no-indice-da-transparencia\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":943,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ww16.ce.gov.br\\\/etice\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Lista de Not\u00edcias\"],\"inLanguage\":\"pt-BR\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ww16.ce.gov.br\\\/etice\\\/2012\\\/11\\\/29\\\/estados-melhoram-pontuacao-no-indice-da-transparencia\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ww16.ce.gov.br\\\/etice\\\/2012\\\/11\\\/29\\\/estados-melhoram-pontuacao-no-indice-da-transparencia\\\/\",\"name\":\"Estados melhoram pontua\u00e7\u00e3o no \u00cdndice da Transpar\u00eancia - ETICE\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ww16.ce.gov.br\\\/etice\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2012-11-29T20:44:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ww16.ce.gov.br\\\/etice\\\/2012\\\/11\\\/29\\\/estados-melhoram-pontuacao-no-indice-da-transparencia\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"pt-BR\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/ww16.ce.gov.br\\\/etice\\\/2012\\\/11\\\/29\\\/estados-melhoram-pontuacao-no-indice-da-transparencia\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ww16.ce.gov.br\\\/etice\\\/2012\\\/11\\\/29\\\/estados-melhoram-pontuacao-no-indice-da-transparencia\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"In\u00edcio\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ww16.ce.gov.br\\\/etice\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Estados melhoram pontua\u00e7\u00e3o no \u00cdndice da Transpar\u00eancia\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ww16.ce.gov.br\\\/etice\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ww16.ce.gov.br\\\/etice\\\/\",\"name\":\"Empresa de Tecnologia da Informa\u00e7\u00e3o do Cear\u00e1\",\"description\":\"Portal ETICE\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ww16.ce.gov.br\\\/etice\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ww16.ce.gov.br\\\/etice\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"pt-BR\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ww16.ce.gov.br\\\/etice\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Empresa de Tecnologia da Informa\u00e7\u00e3o do Cear\u00e1\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ww16.ce.gov.br\\\/etice\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"pt-BR\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ww16.ce.gov.br\\\/etice\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"http:\\\/\\\/ww16.ce.gov.br\\\/etice\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2018\\\/05\\\/etice-clara.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"http:\\\/\\\/ww16.ce.gov.br\\\/etice\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2018\\\/05\\\/etice-clara.png\",\"width\":559,\"height\":106,\"caption\":\"Empresa de Tecnologia da Informa\u00e7\u00e3o do Cear\u00e1\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ww16.ce.gov.br\\\/etice\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ww16.ce.gov.br\\\/etice\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/c161ec0016dc344c216317bdddb5a662\",\"name\":\"Felipe Regino\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"pt-BR\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/c5948532bfed4bf995ab94c145699ff618fbb1a11e1bffe93097e84e5ffdeec3?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/c5948532bfed4bf995ab94c145699ff618fbb1a11e1bffe93097e84e5ffdeec3?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/c5948532bfed4bf995ab94c145699ff618fbb1a11e1bffe93097e84e5ffdeec3?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Felipe Regino\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.ce.gov.br\\\/etice\\\/author\\\/sspdsfeliperegino\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Estados melhoram pontua\u00e7\u00e3o no \u00cdndice da Transpar\u00eancia - ETICE","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/ww16.ce.gov.br\/etice\/2012\/11\/29\/estados-melhoram-pontuacao-no-indice-da-transparencia\/","og_locale":"pt_BR","og_type":"article","og_title":"Estados melhoram pontua\u00e7\u00e3o no \u00cdndice da Transpar\u00eancia - ETICE","og_description":"Ranking do site Contas Abertas mostra que em 18 portais houve melhorias, em rela\u00e7\u00e3o a 2010, e nove tiveram redu\u00e7\u00e3o de nota. A transpar\u00eancia das contas p\u00fablicas dos 26 estados e do Distrito Federal aumentou nos \u00faltimos dois anos, conforme mostra o \u00cdndice de Transpar\u00eancia, iniciativa do site Contas Abertas, que avalia a disponibilidade de […]","og_url":"https:\/\/ww16.ce.gov.br\/etice\/2012\/11\/29\/estados-melhoram-pontuacao-no-indice-da-transparencia\/","og_site_name":"ETICE","article_published_time":"2012-11-29T20:44:00+00:00","author":"Felipe Regino","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Felipe Regino","Est. reading time":"5 minutos"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/ww16.ce.gov.br\/etice\/2012\/11\/29\/estados-melhoram-pontuacao-no-indice-da-transparencia\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ww16.ce.gov.br\/etice\/2012\/11\/29\/estados-melhoram-pontuacao-no-indice-da-transparencia\/"},"author":{"name":"Felipe Regino","@id":"https:\/\/ww16.ce.gov.br\/etice\/#\/schema\/person\/c161ec0016dc344c216317bdddb5a662"},"headline":"Estados melhoram pontua\u00e7\u00e3o no \u00cdndice da Transpar\u00eancia","datePublished":"2012-11-29T20:44:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/ww16.ce.gov.br\/etice\/2012\/11\/29\/estados-melhoram-pontuacao-no-indice-da-transparencia\/"},"wordCount":943,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/ww16.ce.gov.br\/etice\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Lista de Not\u00edcias"],"inLanguage":"pt-BR"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/ww16.ce.gov.br\/etice\/2012\/11\/29\/estados-melhoram-pontuacao-no-indice-da-transparencia\/","url":"https:\/\/ww16.ce.gov.br\/etice\/2012\/11\/29\/estados-melhoram-pontuacao-no-indice-da-transparencia\/","name":"Estados melhoram pontua\u00e7\u00e3o no \u00cdndice da Transpar\u00eancia - ETICE","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ww16.ce.gov.br\/etice\/#website"},"datePublished":"2012-11-29T20:44:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/ww16.ce.gov.br\/etice\/2012\/11\/29\/estados-melhoram-pontuacao-no-indice-da-transparencia\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"pt-BR","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/ww16.ce.gov.br\/etice\/2012\/11\/29\/estados-melhoram-pontuacao-no-indice-da-transparencia\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/ww16.ce.gov.br\/etice\/2012\/11\/29\/estados-melhoram-pontuacao-no-indice-da-transparencia\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"In\u00edcio","item":"https:\/\/ww16.ce.gov.br\/etice\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Estados melhoram pontua\u00e7\u00e3o no \u00cdndice da Transpar\u00eancia"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/ww16.ce.gov.br\/etice\/#website","url":"https:\/\/ww16.ce.gov.br\/etice\/","name":"Empresa de Tecnologia da Informa\u00e7\u00e3o do Cear\u00e1","description":"Portal ETICE","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/ww16.ce.gov.br\/etice\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/ww16.ce.gov.br\/etice\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"pt-BR"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/ww16.ce.gov.br\/etice\/#organization","name":"Empresa de Tecnologia da Informa\u00e7\u00e3o do Cear\u00e1","url":"https:\/\/ww16.ce.gov.br\/etice\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"pt-BR","@id":"https:\/\/ww16.ce.gov.br\/etice\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"http:\/\/ww16.ce.gov.br\/etice\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2018\/05\/etice-clara.png","contentUrl":"http:\/\/ww16.ce.gov.br\/etice\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2018\/05\/etice-clara.png","width":559,"height":106,"caption":"Empresa de Tecnologia da Informa\u00e7\u00e3o do Cear\u00e1"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ww16.ce.gov.br\/etice\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/ww16.ce.gov.br\/etice\/#\/schema\/person\/c161ec0016dc344c216317bdddb5a662","name":"Felipe Regino","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"pt-BR","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c5948532bfed4bf995ab94c145699ff618fbb1a11e1bffe93097e84e5ffdeec3?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c5948532bfed4bf995ab94c145699ff618fbb1a11e1bffe93097e84e5ffdeec3?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c5948532bfed4bf995ab94c145699ff618fbb1a11e1bffe93097e84e5ffdeec3?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Felipe Regino"},"url":"https:\/\/www.ce.gov.br\/etice\/author\/sspdsfeliperegino\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ce.gov.br\/etice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3890","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ce.gov.br\/etice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ce.gov.br\/etice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ce.gov.br\/etice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/12"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ce.gov.br\/etice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3890"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.ce.gov.br\/etice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3890\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ce.gov.br\/etice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3890"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ce.gov.br\/etice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3890"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ce.gov.br\/etice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3890"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}